Voluntary Organisations should consider publishing Gender Pay Gap data (NVCO)

Voluntary organisations should consider publishing information about the differences in pay between men and women even if they have less than 250 employees, an umbrella body has recommended.

New rules introduced in April 2017 mean that all private and voluntary-sector employers in England, Wales and Scotland with 250 or more employees are required to publish information about the differences in pay between men and women on an annual basis from 2017.

Although it employs only around 100 staff, the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO), which represents more than 13,000 charities in England, has voluntarily published its own gender pay gap data in a bid to increase transparency and encourage other charities and social enterprises to do the same.

While paying men and women for the same work at different rates has been illegal for decades, the data required by the new rules also captures pay inequalities resulting from differences in the types of jobs performed by men and women.

The charity umbrella body recommends that organisations should consider collating and publishing the data regardless of size, as a way to reflect on any gender pay differences and to demonstrate a commitment to transparency and accountability.

Charities that have a small number of employees will have to decide whether publishing their data is meaningful, and strike a delicate balance between being transparent and protecting individuals’ data.

Susan Cordingley, director of planning and resources at NCVO, said:

The new rules on gender pay gap data are a good opportunity for organisations of all sizes to stop and think about any gender inequality that may be revealed by the data and if they are doing enough to address it.

This is not only the right thing to do and a valuable tool to think harder about how to maximise talent in the workplace, but it is also a way of moving towards increased transparency, which promotes public trust and confidence in charities.

Many voluntary organisations’ gender pay gap data will be characterised by their employing more women than men, and the same is true for NCVO. Our own data highlights that, while we pay men and women on the same grades identical salaries, there are proportionately more women than men in lower grades and in part-time roles.

Organisations can address this through a range of family-friendly and flexible working policies designed to support women who are still more likely to take time off work to care for children and family, which can hinder their career progress.

NCVO encourages remote working and provides enhanced maternity pay, flexible working hours and enhanced shared parental pay, and our staff survey shows that these are highly valued. But we are always looking for more ways to promote equality in the workplace and strongly encourage other organisations to do the same.

NCVO publish Manifesto for 2017 General Election

What the next government can do to help charities and volunteering make an even bigger difference

The British people are incredibly generous. We have a proud tradition of helping others, giving time and money, sharing skills and coming up with new ways to solve problems.

Whether it’s helping to look after a local park, providing advice on mental health or helping out with sports for children, we come together through charities and community groups. Together, we work on the issues we care about and pursue the interests we enjoy.

At NCVO, we think people getting involved and helping others are among our country’s biggest assets. The 2017 election is an opportunity to look at how we can support and encourage the people and charities who want to help in their communities.

1. Make it easier and more rewarding for people to volunteer

People everywhere want to give their time and talents to their community. We know young people in particular are getting involved in increasing numbers, while businesses recognise that helping staff volunteer builds skills, confidence and employability.

We’d like to make it easier and more rewarding for everyone to volunteer. Anyone who wants to should be able to make a contribution to their community. We want to seed people’s interest in and ability to volunteer, setting them on a path of contributing to their communities, by:

  • getting more employers to allow time off work for volunteering, including time off for charity trustees
  • providing a support fund to address barriers to volunteering for people with disabilities. This could make volunteering accessible to more people, helping with costs such as travel or adaptations to buildings or equipment
  • doing more to recognise the difference that volunteers make to their communities and doing more to celebrate their contribution
  • strengthening volunteer development and management, to ensure volunteers have the right skills and support to make a bigger difference, and a rewarding experience.

Find out how this would work and why it is worth doing.

2. Support local communities for a generation to come

Small and local charities are the glue that binds communities together. With more support, particularly in the form of grant funding, they could do much more. We’d like to create a legacy for small and local charities for a generation to come.

This could be done by investing the money from dormant bank accounts in two ways:

  • Build on the success story of local community foundations by creating income-generating endowment funds. These can be used to fund small and local charities now and into the future. Find out how this would work and why it is worth doing.
  • Put more assets in community ownership. We can create more facilities for the public’s long-term benefit by using the money from dormant accounts to buy local community assets, such as pubs, green spaces or historic buildings, and put them in the control of local people.Find out how this would work and why it is worth doing.

3. Make it easier for charities and volunteers to support our public services

Public services are better when charities and volunteers are involved. From the NHS to social care, fire services to conservation, volunteers in public services support the work of paid staff, freeing them to get on with what they do best. Volunteers are helping services do more.

Charities are doing the same, involving people who use public services in running those services, helping to improve them. They help to make spending on those services go further. Charities can be more involved in delivering services, or they can help to reduce demand for overstretched services, if public money is spent differently.

And with public money tight, charities will rise to the challenge of becoming even more focussed on value for money and impact.

We would like to build on this by:

  • asking services such as the NHS to set targets for the management and development of volunteering. These would aim to increase volunteer numbers, involve volunteers in a wider range of roles, and improve the experience and impact of volunteers.
  • asking our senior public service leaders to become volunteering champions. Champions would raise awareness of where volunteers could make the biggest impact and change culture around involving volunteers. Find out how these would work and why they are worth doing.
  • making better use of public money. We need further reforms to how government buys and provides public services. Public bodies should use grant funding instead of large contracts, and spend public money in a way that takes account of the wider social value of a contract. This will deliver better services and extra value for taxpayers. Find out how this would work and why it is worth doing.

4. Make it easier for people to build their skills and get a good job

Voluntary organisations help build the skilled workforce that our country will need in the future, teaching new skills, networking people to opportunities, giving them a leg up, not a hand out.

Charities and volunteering could do more to build skills and help people to get a good job if we:

  • replace European Union programmes that help people get back to work or start a social enterprise with new, lighter-touch, flexible programmes. These should focus on local people making decisions about what is needed. Find out how this would work and why it is worth doing.
  • make it easier for unemployed people looking for work to volunteer, by getting rid of red tape and confusion about the rules. Find out how this would work and why it is worth doing.

5. Give everybody a stake in post-Brexit Britain

Getting people more involved in their communities is an important way of giving them a say in their future: people will get involved if they know that they are heard and that they are making a difference. Charities can help by giving people the confidence and a route to speak up for themselves, bringing them together to find common ground.

And charities can harness people’s expertise and skills, developing new ways of tackling old problems in a quickly changing world. Charities’ role in providing a voice and informing public debate, either by raising awareness or by influencing change, is valued by  the British people and makes our democracy one of the strongest in the world.

  • We can get more people involved if when parliament legislates to replace EU laws and regulations through the Great Repeal Bill, there is proper chance for changes to be debated and scrutinised, informed by the expertise of charities and the communities they work with. People from the EU have enriched our culture, society and economy. Along with their families, they work and volunteer in our public services, including for charities. We think it right that they should continue to have a stake in the future of country.
  • We ask that as part of the negotiations to leave the EU, the right to stay of people from elsewhere in Europe is resolved without delay. The time and talents of people from overseas will continue to be an important resource for our communities and public services. This will range from the scientists needed by medical research charities to the care assistants needed by social care charities.
  • We ask that simple and effective visa requirements, or a waiver programme, are in place to enable this.

Find out how this would work and why it is worth doing.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss our ideas further, please contact Chris Walker, Senior External Relations Officer, on chris.walker@ncvo.org.uk or 020 7520 3167.

NCVO: “A Snap General Election – What Should Charities Be Doing?”

Source: https://blogs.ncvo.org.uk/2017/04/18/a-snap-general-election-what-should-charities-be-doing/ 

In a political world where leaks are routine, Theresa May’s announcement of an election campaign seems to have caught everyone by surprise. Charities will not have made detailed plans for an election, so it’s worth thinking about what we should be doing to make sure we’re part of the debate.

What happens next?

The first hurdle to cross will be to call an election under the procedure set out in the Fixed Term Parliaments Act. Labour’s announcement that they will be voting for a motion to call an early election means it should be a formality to get the two thirds of MPs required to satisfy the requirements of the Act, avoiding the need for a formal vote of no confidence and a 14 day period in which another party could seek to form an alternative government.

Parliament will dissolve 25 days before the nominated election date, but this can be amended by statutory instrument, as was done in 2015 to allow a longer campaign. We’ll have to wait to see when the campaign begins in earnest, but in practice it has already begun.

How can charities prepare?

The first thing for charities to do is refamiliarise themselves with Charity Commission election campaigning guidance to ensure they are compliant with charity law surrounding campaigning during elections and the Lobbying Act.

Much has been made of the effect of the Lobbying Act on charity campaigning during elections and you should make sure you are familiar with the law, but remember that most charities are unlikely to meet the definition of controlled expenditure if they campaign on a cross-party basis on the substance of policies.

The dynamics of a snap election are going to be very different than normal, when we have a rough timescale even if we don’t know the exact date. Candidate engagement is going to be much harder, not least because a significant proportion of those who will be standing on 8 June will not have been selected yet, and a major hustings plan will be more difficult to co-ordinate.

Manifestos

One of the key milestones of any campaign is the publication of party manifestos. When an election date is known, parties will be working on the policy contained in those manifestos for a year or more beforehand. Obviously that detailed work can’t be completed before June, so expect shorter Brexit-focused manifestos that draw a lot on 2015 policies.

The parties’ policy gurus will already be thinking about what goes in, so finding out quickly who to submit recommendations to will be important for charities that want their voice to be heard in the campaign and in the next parliament. One word of caution, approval for new radical ideas is going to be much harder to achieve in such a short timescale, so aside from the obvious need to influence policies around Brexit, I would focus on encouraging parties to reaffirm existing commitments.

What will we be doing?

For our part, we’ll be making the case for the voluntary sector and volunteering to help solve many of the country’s problems. We know that volunteering can be an amazing route to improving skills and making new connections, changing people’s lives and bonding communities closer together. We know that voluntary organisations can run high-quality, efficient public services, for example, but that they’re often excluded from doing so. And most pressingly on the policy front, we’ll be highlighting the important role that the sector has to play in shaping Brexit policies. We want to make sure that Brexit doesn’t mean weakening or removing important safeguards for people and the environment. Charities must be involved in advising on and scrutinising proposals at every step of the way.

NCVO’s chief executive, Sir Stuart Etherington, has already called for European nationals in the UK to be allowed to stay. Charities will need visa arrangements that work for sectors such as social care and medical research, which depend on the involvement of staff who’ve moved here from around Europe. And charities must be involved in designing replacements – better targeted, more coherent ones – for EU programmes in areas such as employment and skills training.

It’s going to be a much busier couple of months for charity campaigners than we were expecting, but as always an election provides an excellent opportunity to make the case for the changes we want to see, and to make sure that the voice of charities is heard loud and clear.

NCVO: What might charity Trustees learn from the closure of Kids Company?

A version of this article first appeared on Guardian Voluntary Sector Network

The sad news that Kids Company is closing down is a crushing blow to everyone involved. Regardless of the inevitable debate regarding the effectiveness of its work and accusations of a lack of management control, its clients today don’t have the services that they had, and its staff and volunteers are left without an idea of what the future holds. Those volunteers include the trustees, a position I found myself in last year, when as one of the trustees of the BeatBullying charity we made the difficult decision to enter our charity into a creditors’ voluntary liquidation, with the result that the charity closed down.

Be wary of speculation: nobody knows the full story

From my experience, I think it’s important to highlight that the only thing outsiders should really know is that they don’t know what is really going on. Large charities like Kids Company are often incorporated as companies and as such subject to company law. Faced by an inquisitive media, we were strongly advised to say nothing by our lawyers, specifically because any comments might affect our chances of getting someone to take over the charity as a going concern. This is important, because once a company becomes insolvent, the primary stakeholders become the creditors. Whereas before our primary duty as trustees was to the beneficiaries of the charity, after a declaration of insolvency, you must not prejudice the interests of creditors. And company law trumps charity law. Nevertheless, be prepared for criticism for your silence. And for the inevitable filling of the media vacuum by those outside the organisation (which is why my comments here aren’t about Kids Company specifically).

Just because the doors are closed…

If saying nothing to the outside world was difficult, what was even more difficult was the knowledge that our primary responsibility was now to creditors. In other words, not the staff or the children and young people who were our users, the people for whom we got into this. But that doesn’t mean that you can’t talk to other charities or statutory agencies about who can help the service users, and then signpost to them. We did an awful lot of phoning in those long, difficult days – and for a sector that is often accused of being ultra-competitive, we got many offers of support from other charities.

Although the doors were metaphorically closed, our experience of the voluntary liquidation route was that there is still an awful lot of work required if you want to try and preserve the service for users. The single most important lesson here is that the staff (many of whom stuck around, despite not being paid or getting much in the way of communication from us) and the trustees have to stick together. I can’t underline enough how important this is: a number of people subsequently told me that in their experience the trustees had run for the hills. The Administrator arguably should do this work, but the challenge might be that there isn’t enough money left for an administrator to spend time trying to transfer the charity as a going concern. So if you care about the service and the beneficiaries, you’ll probably have to put the hours in.

Get proper legal and financial advice.

We had some fantastic professional advice, including pro bono advice. I would strongly recommend that you get this, and the earlier the better. That’s particularly the case if you are in financial difficulties: nobody wants to be accused of wrongful trading. If you’re at the point where you have concerns about whether or not the charity is a going concern, its more important than ever that you get accurate, timely financial information. It’s likely that the board will be meeting at least once a week to discuss this.

Much tends to get written about whether funders were right to make further payments to a charity that subsequently fails. Yet there is a similar onus on the trustees to be sure that in continuing to ‘trade’ at that point that they had a reasonable certainty of continuing as a going concern. Get professional advice (ideally from an insolvency practitioner), it’s out there. Also make sure that you tell the Charity Commission what is happening, as they need to know. It wont help in the long term if they are the last to know.

But we still need to address the starvation cycle

Every year thousands of charities close. Thousands are established. The news of a large charity closing triggers introspection (there but for the grace of God…) but even more thousands successfully deliver brilliant campaigns or services. Newspaper website articles nevertheless are deluged with inaccurate comments criticising charities for their poor governance and financial incompetence, but they also highlight some hard truths and paradoxes about how our sector works.

The brave not so new world of contracting with the state for the delivery of services has singularly failed to enable charities to build their resilience. While many charities now have a reserves policy, implementing that policy and building 3 months’ worth of expenditure is a goal many find unattainable. Charities with reserves can find it hard to convince donors and funders that they should give their support (the so called non-profit starvation cycle). And donors dislike of funding core costs or ‘administration’ mean that it remains difficult to put in place the sort of financial and outcomes reporting infrastructure that build resilience in many charities. We need to shift the questions from low overheads to high impact.

overhead

Many trustees will no doubt be more carefully reading the financial report in advance of their next board meeting as a result of recent events. That is a good thing. I’d particularly recommend that you read the Charity Commission’s 15 questions to ask at your next board meeting. And just as boards sticking together at times of crisis is a good thing, I hope we as a charity sector stick together now, and support those who are currently trying to save the services provided by Kids Company, in the anticipation that we will learn from their experience later in the future.

source: http://blogs.ncvo.org.uk/2015/08/07/what-might-charity-trustees-learn-from-the-closure-of-kids-company/